Coaching practices for I Open with the Big Request and Watch it Get Shot Down and Afterward I Notice the People Who Got Me to Commit Started with Something Tiny I Could Easily Say Yes to They Had Me Agreeing Before I Realized Where it Led
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For I Open with the Big Request and Watch it Get Shot Down and Afterward I Notice the People Who Got Me to Commit Started with Something Tiny I Could Easily Say Yes to They Had Me Agreeing Before I Realized Where it Led, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- I open with the big request and watch it get shot down, and afterward I notice the people who got me to commit started with something tiny I could easily say yes to
- I tend to drop the whole big request on someone cold, all at once, and they balk
- There’s a big thing I want someone to agree to and I know if I ask straight out they’ll say no
- I want to lead with a bigger ask so my real request lands easier, but I keep second-guessing how high to go
- We had one person open with the big request and then someone else came in to make the real ask, and it just fell flat
Practices that may help
- Commitment and consistency
Get a small, voluntary commitment first; people then act to stay consistent with it.
Cialdini’s Principles of Influence - Elicit a small consistency cue before the main ask
Get a small, genuine agreement or self-description before the main request — people act consistently with what they’ve said.
Pre-Suasion, Made Practical - Start with a minimal, easy-to-agree request
The first ask should be small enough that virtually anyone would say yes.
The Foot-in-the-Door Technique, Made Practical - Open with a large but plausible request
The initial ask must be large enough to likely be refused but not so extreme it looks absurd.
The Door-in-the-Face Technique, Made Practical - Keep the same person making both requests
The door-in-the-face effect is substantially weaker when a different person makes the second ask.
The Door-in-the-Face Technique, Made Practical - Keep the second request related to the first
The foot-in-the-door effect is strongest when the small and large asks share a category.
The Foot-in-the-Door Technique, Made Practical - Make the step-down visibly deliberate
A concession that is invisible or unexplained carries no reciprocity weight.
The Door-in-the-Face Technique, Made Practical - Use the door-in-the-face technique to make the real ask seem small
Make a large, reasonable request first; after it is declined, your actual (smaller) ask feels like a concession.
The Contrast Principle, Made Practical - Recognize and respect the ethical limits of foot-in-the-door
The technique can manufacture commitment to things people would not freely choose — that is a misuse.
The Foot-in-the-Door Technique, Made Practical - Shrink the request to below the reactance threshold
Small asks rarely feel like threats to freedom; large demands almost always do.
Psychological Reactance: Working With the Push-Back Reflex
Related concerns
- When Pre Suasion Ask For Consistency Cues
Get a small, genuine agreement or self-description before the main request — people act consistently with what they’ve said.
Elicit a small consistency cue before the main ask
- When The Foot In The Door Keep Second Request Related
The foot-in-the-door effect is strongest when the small and large asks share a category.
Keep the second request related to the first
- Small Yeses Before The Big Ask
The first ask should be small enough that virtually anyone would say yes.
Start with a minimal, easy-to-agree request
- When The Foot In The Door Start With A Minimal Request
The first ask should be small enough that virtually anyone would say yes.
- Foot In The Door First Step
The foot-in-the-door technique works by getting a small commitment first — then making a larger request. The initial compliance activates self-perception ("I’m someone who does this") and commitment-consistency processes that make the larger request harder to refuse. Freedman & Fraser’s 1966 original study is well-replicated, with meta-analyses finding medium effect sizes — though the effect size and boundary conditions vary meaningfully by context.
- How To Make A Big Ask Work
The initial ask must be large enough to likely be refused but not so extreme it looks absurd.
Open with a large but plausible request
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.