Test your updated model in new situations
Design a small experiment that would confirm or disconfirm the principle you just derived.
Why it works
A generalized principle that is never tested remains a hypothesis, not knowledge. Active experimentation closes Kolb’s cycle by turning the abstract principle back into concrete action — with the explicit intent of generating new experience that tests the principle’s range. This is what makes experiential learning genuinely cumulative: each cycle refines the model rather than repeating the same observation in different clothing.
How to do it
- Take the principle you derived and identify a situation where it would predict a specific outcome.
- Design the simplest action that would test the prediction.
- Execute it, then return to the reflective observation step.
Evidence
The experimental mindset — testing principles rather than assuming them — is consistent with scientific reasoning research and with research on hypothesis-testing in naturalistic learning. Klahr and Dunbar (1988) modeled scientific reasoning as a coordinated search across a hypothesis space and an experiment space, giving a concrete account of the design-a-test move this practice names. That deliberate experimentation accelerates skill development is mechanistically supported. (mechanistic)
Directly isolating "active experimentation" as a learning phase from the overall reflective cycle is methodologically difficult; the evidence is for the whole reflective practice process.
Sources
- Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1–48. About this work
Common mistake
Treating the principle as confirmed on the basis of the single experience it was derived from — an induction from n=1 that will be wrong in every case where the original experience was exceptional.
Practice this with IX Coach
More practices for Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle: Learning by Doing and Reflecting
- Reflect deliberately after each significant experience
Immediately after a meaningful event, pause and observe what happened and how you responded — before interpreting it.
- Extract a generalizable principle from what you observed
After observing what happened, ask: "What general rule does this experience support or challenge?"
- Complete the full cycle — do not skip stages
Identify which stage you habitually skip and repair it deliberately.
- Examine your assumptions, not just your actions
When reflection reveals a pattern of repeated mistakes, look for the underlying belief that generates them.
- Keep a learning journal to externalize and accumulate reflections
Write regularly about experiences, observations, and derived principles to make the learning cycle visible over time.
Related concepts
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0: cite or embed this practice · more practices graded Plausible mechanism