Quantity first: generate the most ideas possible before evaluating any
The best way to have a good idea is to have many ideas — originality rises with volume, so generate recklessly before selecting.
Why it works
Expert judgment, applied too early in a creative session, narrows the search to the most immediately plausible options — which are also the most familiar ones. Deferring judgment until a large quantity of ideas has been generated keeps the creative search in the less-familiar regions of the space, where more original ideas are statistically more likely to be found. This is Linus Pauling’s principle: you cannot predict which idea will be good, so generate many.
How to do it
- Set a quantity target before you start: 20 ideas, 30 headlines, 15 solutions.
- Write each idea as it arrives without pausing to evaluate it.
- When you feel stuck, lower the bar: half-ideas, fragment-ideas, and bad ideas all count.
- Evaluate only after the target quantity is reached.
Evidence
Generative fluency research consistently finds that later ideas are rated more original than earlier ones; deferring evaluation until higher quantities are reached increases the probability that the final selection includes more original work. (observational)
Brainstorming group research shows complex results; the quantity-before-quality principle is best supported for individual generation. Group brainstorming without process intervention frequently underperforms nominal groups (individuals working alone).
Sources
- Mednick (1962), associative basis of the creative process, Psychological Review About this work
Common mistake
Stopping at the first three or four ideas that seem good and treating the quantity phase as done — the original ideas are almost always deeper in the list, not at the front.
Practice this with IX Coach
More practices for The Beginner’s Mind in Creative Practice
- First-draft permission: produce something deliberately bad on purpose
Commit to writing, sketching, or making the worst version you can imagine — terrible on purpose removes the evaluative stake.
- Copy masters to see how they made choices you take for granted
Reproduce an admired work by hand and pay attention to every decision — copying is how beginners see what experts do invisibly.
- Borrow the conventions of a different field and apply them to yours
Take the organizing principles of an adjacent discipline and treat them as constraints for your creative problem — the unfamiliar conventions force beginner perception.
- Identify the constraint you invented: ask "who said it had to be this way?"
Name one element of your creative work you have never questioned and spend 20 minutes treating it as optional.
- Write for an ignorant reader: explain it to someone who knows nothing
Describe your creative work to an imaginary person who has no context — the explanation forces you to see what you have been assuming.
- Diversify creative inputs: consume across domains and outside your taste
Read, watch, listen to work that you do not immediately like — outside-taste input breaks the feedback loop that narrows creative range over time.
Related concepts
- Beginner's Mind (Shoshin), Made Practical
Shoshin — the Zen practice of not-knowing as a daily discipline
- Deliberate Constraints, Made Practical
The counterintuitive evidence that limitation fuels originality
- Divergent Thinking: Generating Many Ideas
Generating quantity, separating ideation from judgment, and why group brainstorming disappoints
- Osborn’s Brainstorming Rules, Made Practical
The original four rules, the mechanisms behind them, and what the research actually shows
Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0: cite or embed this practice · more practices graded Observational studies