Sample inventive principles to generate solution directions
Apply one or more of TRIZ’s 40 inventive principles as generative lenses, even without the full contradiction matrix.
Why it works
The 40 inventive principles are distilled solution archetypes that recur across domains and industries. Applying even a few of them (segmentation, the other way round, dynamics, preliminary action) forces the brain out of its default solution search and into structurally different solution spaces. The principles work as generative prompts — not answers, but oblique questions that bypass fixation.
How to do it
- Pick 3–5 inventive principles at random or from a contradiction-matrix lookup (segmentation, preliminary action, dynamics, inversion, composite materials are good starting points).
- For each principle, ask: "If I applied this principle to my problem, what would that look like?"
- Generate at least one concrete solution direction per principle before evaluating any.
- Combine promising directions from two different principles to find novel hybrid approaches.
Evidence
The 40 principles are derived from Altshuller’s large-scale patent analysis (reportedly 40,000+ patents in early versions, later expanded). Their efficacy as creative prompts is supported by practitioner reports and some observational studies of engineering teams; controlled experimental evidence is limited. (observational)
Most published TRIZ outcome evidence comes from engineering and product development; generalization to knowledge work or personal problem solving is plausible but not well studied.
Common mistake
Evaluating each principle’s generated idea immediately, which kills divergent search before the full solution space is visible. Generate first, evaluate separately.
Practice this with IX Coach
7 days free, then $40/month (~$1.30/day).
More practices for TRIZ: Systematic Invention and the Logic of Contradictions
- Name the contradiction at the heart of the problem
State exactly which parameter you need to improve and which parameter gets worse as a result.
- Define the ideal final result first
Describe the perfect outcome as if the solution already exists and costs nothing, then work backward to what could enable it.
- Trim components to find what you can remove
Systematically ask which components in your current solution could be removed if another component took over their function.
- Inventory available resources before adding anything new
List all time, space, information, and energy already present in or around the problem — solutions often hide there.
- Calibrate whether the problem requires invention or just search
Determine whether your problem is already solved elsewhere before investing in original invention.
Related concepts
- Problem Reframing: Solving the Right Problem First
Why the problem you first name is rarely the problem worth solving
- Constraint Relaxation: Escaping the Walls You Built Yourself
How over-constrained thinking blocks insight, and what to do about it
- Osborn’s Brainstorming Rules, Made Practical
The original four rules, the mechanisms behind them, and what the research actually shows