Coaching practices for Dunbar's Number with My Team
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Dunbar's Number with My Team, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- If you asked me to name my actual five closest people I’m not sure I could
- My calendar is packed with people and plans and yet I feel weirdly lonely in all of it
- I’m not someone who does heart-to-hearts easily, so my friendships seem to stall out at small talk
- I still feel just as close to people I haven’t actually talked to in months, and I keep assuming the bond is fine on warmth alone
- I let all my looser acquaintances go totally silent because they felt less important than my close people
Practices that may help
- Dunbar's Number
Robin Dunbar's research proposes that the human neocortex supports a stable social group of roughly 150 people, with nested layers of closer relationships (5, 15, 50) requiring progressively more time investment to maintain. The 150-person figure has observational support across hunter-gatherer societies, historical military units, and company sizes; the nested-layer model is more contested. The practical implication is that meaningful relationships are a limited resource that require deliberate allocation. - Map your social layers using Dunbar's concentric circles
Know which five people are in your inner circle and who fills the 15 and 50 layers.
Dunbar's Number - Prioritize depth over breadth in social investment
Having five genuinely close friends is more protective of wellbeing than having fifty adequate ones.
Dunbar's Number - Use shared activities rather than conversation alone to build bonds
Doing things together creates bonds more efficiently than talking about the relationship.
Dunbar's Number - Invest contact time as the currency of closeness
Relationships are maintained by time investment; without it, they drift toward outer layers.
Dunbar's Number - Maintain weak ties for information and opportunity
The 50-to-150 layer isn't maintenance overhead — it's your network's reach.
Dunbar's Number - Triage your outer layers to protect inner-layer capacity
You cannot expand your inner circle without something moving outward — the constraint is cognitive, not motivational.
Dunbar's Number - Align around collective results, not individual status
Teams fail when members prioritize their own visibility or department’s success over the shared goal.
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, Made Practical - Protect the advantages of small — resist headcount as a measure of success
Adding people to a team adds communication overhead faster than it adds output — protect the productivity of small.
Designing a Calm Company (Fried & Hansson) - Use structured team forecasting to aggregate diverse views
Combine independent estimates from multiple people before the group talks — aggregation beats any single expert.
Superforecasting
Related concerns
- Dunbars Number After A Loss
Robin Dunbar's research proposes that the human neocortex supports a stable social group of roughly 150 people, with nested layers of closer relationships (5, 15, 50) requiring progressively more time investment to maintain. The 150-person figure has observational support across hunter-gatherer societies, historical military units, and company sizes; the nested-layer model is more contested. The practical implication is that meaningful relationships are a limited resource that require deliberate allocation.
- Dunbars Number As A Parent
Robin Dunbar's research proposes that the human neocortex supports a stable social group of roughly 150 people, with nested layers of closer relationships (5, 15, 50) requiring progressively more time investment to maintain. The 150-person figure has observational support across hunter-gatherer societies, historical military units, and company sizes; the nested-layer model is more contested. The practical implication is that meaningful relationships are a limited resource that require deliberate allocation.
- Dunbars Number At Work
Robin Dunbar's research proposes that the human neocortex supports a stable social group of roughly 150 people, with nested layers of closer relationships (5, 15, 50) requiring progressively more time investment to maintain. The 150-person figure has observational support across hunter-gatherer societies, historical military units, and company sizes; the nested-layer model is more contested. The practical implication is that meaningful relationships are a limited resource that require deliberate allocation.
- Dunbars Number During Conflict
Robin Dunbar's research proposes that the human neocortex supports a stable social group of roughly 150 people, with nested layers of closer relationships (5, 15, 50) requiring progressively more time investment to maintain. The 150-person figure has observational support across hunter-gatherer societies, historical military units, and company sizes; the nested-layer model is more contested. The practical implication is that meaningful relationships are a limited resource that require deliberate allocation.
- Dunbars Number For My Teenager
Robin Dunbar's research proposes that the human neocortex supports a stable social group of roughly 150 people, with nested layers of closer relationships (5, 15, 50) requiring progressively more time investment to maintain. The 150-person figure has observational support across hunter-gatherer societies, historical military units, and company sizes; the nested-layer model is more contested. The practical implication is that meaningful relationships are a limited resource that require deliberate allocation.
- Dunbars Number Layers
Robin Dunbar's research proposes that the human neocortex supports a stable social group of roughly 150 people, with nested layers of closer relationships (5, 15, 50) requiring progressively more time investment to maintain. The 150-person figure has observational support across hunter-gatherer societies, historical military units, and company sizes; the nested-layer model is more contested. The practical implication is that meaningful relationships are a limited resource that require deliberate allocation.
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.