Coaching practices for Evidence for and Against Belief
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Evidence for and Against Belief, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- I’m leaning hard on the evidence that lines up with what I want to be true and brushing off the rest
- I’ve already landed on the harsh thing I believe about myself
- I can argue myself out of the bad belief on paper and still feel it in my gut the second I’m around people
- A flimsy study that confirms what I want I’ll wave straight through, but a solid one that contradicts me I’ll pick apart for hours
- I’m holding a belief tightly and I want to test it honestly, but I know that the second I go looking I’ll find whatever confirms it
Practices that may help
- Evaluate evidence by its likelihood ratio, not by how it makes you feel
Ask how much more likely this evidence would be if you’re right versus if you’re wrong.
Bayesian Thinking: How to Update Beliefs Rationally - Testing a core belief with historical evidence
Once you have a core belief, survey all your history for evidence that contradicts it.
The Downward Arrow: Uncovering the Core Beliefs Behind Distress - Behavioral experiments to test core beliefs in vivo
Design a real-world action that tests the core belief, then observe what actually happens.
The Downward Arrow: Uncovering the Core Beliefs Behind Distress - Apply the same evidence standard regardless of whether you like the conclusion
Grade the evidence before you know which conclusion it supports.
Motivated Reasoning - Specify what would falsify your belief before you look at evidence
Write down what evidence would prove you wrong before you go looking.
Falsification Thinking - Actively seek disconfirming evidence
Deliberately look for evidence that your current belief is wrong.
Superforecasting - Weigh disconfirming evidence more heavily than confirming evidence
One strong counterexample outweighs many confirming examples for a universal claim.
Falsification Thinking - Actively seek evidence that would disconfirm your belief
Ask: "What would change my mind?" and then look for exactly that.
Bayesian Thinking: How to Update Beliefs Rationally - Slow the reflexive loop
Your current beliefs shape which data you select, reinforcing themselves — interrupt this loop deliberately.
The Ladder of Inference - Practice elenchus — cross-examine your own beliefs
Pick one confident belief and interrogate it as Socrates would: What do you mean? How do you know? What would refute it?
The Socratic Method, Made Practical
Related concerns
- Disputing Beliefs Evidence
Write down what evidence would prove you wrong before you go looking.
Specify what would falsify your belief before you look at evidence
- How To Resolve A Conflict Between The Beliefs Of Establishment Scientists Researchers And My Evidence
Grade the evidence before you know which conclusion it supports.
Apply the same evidence standard regardless of whether you like the conclusion
- Disconfirming Evidence
One strong counterexample outweighs many confirming examples for a universal claim.
Weigh disconfirming evidence more heavily than confirming evidence
- Find The Believers
The most efficient expansion is not converting skeptics — it is finding people who already share your belief.
Communicate your Why to those who already believe it
- Finding Disconfirming Evidence
Deliberately look for evidence that your current belief is wrong.
Actively seek disconfirming evidence
- How To Weigh Evidence
Ask how much more likely this evidence would be if you’re right versus if you’re wrong.
Evaluate evidence by its likelihood ratio, not by how it makes you feel
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.