Coaching practices for Improving Agreed Deals
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Improving Agreed Deals, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- We’ve just shaken hands on something we both accepted, but I have this nagging sense the deal isn’t as good as it could be for either of us
- We finally reached a deal, but I have this nagging sense we both grabbed the first version that worked just to be done
- The deal is closed and fine, but I keep negotiating in the dark
- The deal is stuck because they swear the numbers will hit and I’m sure they won’t, and neither of us will budge on our forecast
- It’s turned into a pure contest of who’ll budge first, and I hate that whoever caves just loses face
Practices that may help
- Propose a post-settlement settlement to optimize an agreed deal
After reaching a deal, offer to see if you can both do better — many agreements leave joint value on the table.
ZOPA: The Zone of Possible Agreement - Use a post-settlement settlement to improve a deal after agreement
Once you have a deal, offer to keep exploring whether a better one exists for both sides.
Expanding the Pie: Negotiation Beyond Splitting the Difference - Run a negotiation debrief to learn what value was left on the table
After closing, compare priorities with the other side to see the trades you both missed.
Expanding the Pie: Negotiation Beyond Splitting the Difference - Bridge disagreements with contingent terms
When you disagree about the future, bet on it — tie terms to what actually happens.
Win-Win Thinking: Expanding the Pie - Insist on objective criteria to evaluate options
Agree on an independent standard — market rate, precedent, expert opinion — before applying it to the specific deal.
Principled Negotiation, Made Practical - Logroll by trading issues of unequal importance
Concede on what matters less to you in exchange for gains on what matters more.
Expanding the Pie: Negotiation Beyond Splitting the Difference - Make the third alternative tangible with a prototype or model
Turn an abstract third-alternative idea into something both parties can react to together.
The Third Alternative, Made Practical - Insist on objective criteria
Anchor the deal to independent standards — market rates, precedent, expert opinion — not willpower.
Getting to Yes: Principled Negotiation - Frame proposals as "yesable propositions"
Make your proposals easy for the counterpart to say yes to — not easy on your terms, but easy to accept as legitimate.
Principled Negotiation, Made Practical - Accompany your final offer with a small non-monetary concession
Adding a low-cost non-monetary item to your final offer signals genuine limit while giving the counterpart a win.
The Ackerman Method, Made Practical
Related concerns
- Effort Pact
After reaching a deal, offer to see if you can both do better — many agreements leave joint value on the table.
Propose a post-settlement settlement to optimize an agreed deal
- How To Optimize A Deal
After reaching a deal, offer to see if you can both do better — many agreements leave joint value on the table.
- Improve A Deal After Agreement
After reaching a deal, offer to see if you can both do better — many agreements leave joint value on the table.
- Earn Out Negotiation
After reaching a deal, offer to see if you can both do better — many agreements leave joint value on the table.
- Fair Standards Negotiation
Agree on an independent standard — market rate, precedent, expert opinion — before applying it to the specific deal.
Insist on objective criteria to evaluate options
- Fisher And Ury Negotiation
Principled negotiation, developed by Roger Fisher and William Ury in Getting to Yes, replaces positional bargaining with a method built on four elements: separate the people from the problem, focus on interests rather than positions, generate options for mutual gain, and insist on objective criteria. It aims for agreements that are better for both parties than their alternatives — without requiring either to capitulate or play hardball.
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.