Coaching practices for Mating in Captivity Sustaining Desire in Long Term Relationships After a Loss
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Mating in Captivity Sustaining Desire in Long Term Relationships After a Loss, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- After the baby, the move, the hard year, we just quietly stopped reaching for each other
- I’ve folded so completely into us that I’m not sure I have a life of my own anymore
- Everything between us has gone so safe and predictable
- We share everything — same friends, same schedule, every thought as it lands — and somewhere in all that togetherness the wanting evaporated, like there’s no distance left to feel any pull across.
- I look at my partner and barely see them anymore
Practices that may help
- Mating in Captivity: Sustaining Desire in Long-Term Relationships
Esther Perel argues that the conditions that make love secure — closeness, familiarity, predictability — are structurally at odds with the conditions that sustain erotic desire — mystery, distance, and the thrill of unpredictability. Sustaining desire is not about technique but about holding the paradox: you can be deeply known and still be a little unknown, still be an object of curiosity for each other. - Rekindling after a drift: returning to aliveness
Recognize a drift in erotic connection as normal — and name it as the beginning of a renewal, not a failure.
Mating in Captivity: Sustaining Desire in Long-Term Relationships - Cultivating mystery: becoming interesting to yourself first
Invest in your own aliveness — your pursuits, pleasures, and personhood — not primarily to attract your partner, but because your vitality is the resource desire draws from.
Mating in Captivity: Sustaining Desire in Long-Term Relationships - Expanding eroticism beyond sex
Recognize and cultivate the erotic in non-sexual moments: risk, play, creativity, surprise.
Mating in Captivity: Sustaining Desire in Long-Term Relationships - Creating space: the paradox of distance and desire
Build deliberate separateness — apart time, separate interests, separate friendships — as the condition desire needs to regenerate.
Mating in Captivity: Sustaining Desire in Long-Term Relationships - The erotic gaze: seeing your partner freshly
Deliberately practice seeing your partner as a stranger might — with curiosity, not familiarity.
Mating in Captivity: Sustaining Desire in Long-Term Relationships - Talking about desire without killing it
Name what you want without reducing it to a problem to be solved or a complaint to be managed.
Mating in Captivity: Sustaining Desire in Long-Term Relationships - Cultivating complicity: shared secret aliveness
Build a private world of in-jokes, gestures, and references that only you two share.
Mating in Captivity: Sustaining Desire in Long-Term Relationships - Distinguish adaptive from complicated continuing bonds
Notice whether your bond with the person supports life re-engagement or prevents it.
Continuing Bonds in Grief, Made Practical - Carry forward the person’s legacy in your own life
Identify values, projects, or commitments the person cared about and carry them forward yourself.
Continuing Bonds in Grief, Made Practical
Related concerns
- Eroticism In Relationships
Recognize and cultivate the erotic in non-sexual moments: risk, play, creativity, surprise.
Expanding eroticism beyond sex
- Mating In Captivity Esther Perel
Esther Perel argues that the conditions that make love secure — closeness, familiarity, predictability — are structurally at odds with the conditions that sustain erotic desire — mystery, distance, and the thrill of unpredictability. Sustaining desire is not about technique but about holding the paradox: you can be deeply known and still be a little unknown, still be an object of curiosity for each other.
- Mating In Captivity Sustaining Desire In Long Term Relationships As A Caregiver
Esther Perel argues that the conditions that make love secure — closeness, familiarity, predictability — are structurally at odds with the conditions that sustain erotic desire — mystery, distance, and the thrill of unpredictability. Sustaining desire is not about technique but about holding the paradox: you can be deeply known and still be a little unknown, still be an object of curiosity for each other.
- Mating In Captivity Sustaining Desire In Long Term Relationships At Work
Esther Perel argues that the conditions that make love secure — closeness, familiarity, predictability — are structurally at odds with the conditions that sustain erotic desire — mystery, distance, and the thrill of unpredictability. Sustaining desire is not about technique but about holding the paradox: you can be deeply known and still be a little unknown, still be an object of curiosity for each other.
- Mating In Captivity Sustaining Desire In Long Term Relationships During A Big Change
Esther Perel argues that the conditions that make love secure — closeness, familiarity, predictability — are structurally at odds with the conditions that sustain erotic desire — mystery, distance, and the thrill of unpredictability. Sustaining desire is not about technique but about holding the paradox: you can be deeply known and still be a little unknown, still be an object of curiosity for each other.
- Mating In Captivity Sustaining Desire In Long Term Relationships With Friends
Esther Perel argues that the conditions that make love secure — closeness, familiarity, predictability — are structurally at odds with the conditions that sustain erotic desire — mystery, distance, and the thrill of unpredictability. Sustaining desire is not about technique but about holding the paradox: you can be deeply known and still be a little unknown, still be an object of curiosity for each other.
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.