Encourage the effort and the process, not the outcome
Encouragement builds inner confidence; outcome-praise creates dependency on adult evaluation.
Why it works
Dreikurs distinguished encouragement — which focuses on effort, progress, and contribution — from praise, which evaluates the outcome and makes the child dependent on adult approval for self-worth. Encouragement activates intrinsic motivation by tying the good feeling to the child’s own action; praise ties it to the parent’s judgment, making the child anxious for approval and avoidant of failure. This is consistent with Carol Dweck’s growth mindset research, which shows process praise predicts resilience and effort.
How to do it
- Replace evaluative praise ("That’s amazing!") with specific encouragement ("You kept working on that even when it was hard — that took persistence.").
- Notice improvement, not just success: "You made fewer errors than last time" is encouraging; "You got an A!" is praising the grade.
- Focus on contribution: "The team really benefited from what you did" — connecting their action to a larger purpose.
Evidence
Growth mindset research (Dweck) provides robust support for process praise over outcome praise: children praised for effort chose harder challenges, recovered better from failure, and outperformed children praised for ability in multiple studies. A longitudinal study (Gunderson et al., 2013) found that the proportion of process praise parents gave 1- to 3-year-olds predicted those children’s motivational frameworks five years later, extending the finding beyond the lab into everyday parent language. (rct)
Growth mindset research has faced some replication challenges in larger samples; the process-praise vs. ability-praise distinction remains one of the more robust findings, but effect sizes vary across contexts.
Sources
- Mueller, C. M. & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52.
- Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52.
- Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1- to 3-year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84(5), 1526–1541.
Common mistake
Adding a process component to outcome praise rather than leading with it: "Great A — and you worked hard on it!" still anchors the value on the grade.
Practice this with IX Coach
7 days free, then $40/month (~$1.30/day).
More practices for Natural and Logical Consequences (Rudolf Dreikurs)
- Distinguish consequences from punishment before you intervene
Ask: is this related to the behavior, reasonable, and respectful? If not, it’s punishment dressed as a consequence.
- Allow natural consequences to do the teaching
Step back and let the world respond — your child learns more from being cold than from being lectured about coats.
- Design logical consequences that are directly related to the behavior
The consequence should be the logical response to the choice, so the child sees the connection.
- Identify the mistaken goal behind the misbehavior
Dreikurs argued that misbehavior is always purposeful — the child is pursuing belonging or significance through a mistaken strategy.
- Follow through on the stated consequence calmly and without anger
The consequence teaches; the anger confuses — keep them separate.
Related concepts
- Authoritative Parenting (Diana Baumrind)
High warmth and high structure — the combination the research supports
- Positive Discipline (Jane Nelsen)
Kind and firm — belonging and significance through mutual respect
- Growth Mindset: The Honest Version
The fixed-vs-growth idea, the real mechanisms, and where the evidence is weak