Audit for gravity problems blocking your plans
Identify which constraints you treat as fixed that are actually choices — and test whether they are as fixed as they feel.
Why it works
Burnett and Evans call "gravity problems" the constraints that feel like facts of physics but are actually beliefs — "I can’t leave this city," "I need this salary." Cognitive restructuring research shows that reframing perceived constraints as choices (even choices you ultimately keep making) restores agency and opens option space. Many plans people never sketch are blocked by gravity problems that would dissolve under examination.
How to do it
- List the three biggest constraints on your ability to pursue Plan B or Plan C.
- For each, ask: "Is this a fact of nature, or is it a choice I am making (for reasons that may be good)?"
- If it is a choice, write what you would lose by making a different choice — this is the actual cost, not the impossibility.
- Identify one constraint you have been treating as fixed that you would be willing to test.
Evidence
Perceived behavioral control — the belief that one can perform a behavior — is a major predictor of whether people attempt change; erroneously low perceived control suppresses option consideration. Cognitive restructuring techniques that reframe perceived constraints are well supported in CBT literature. (clinical)
The "gravity problem" framing is specific to the Designing Your Life framework; the underlying mechanism (perceived control) is well supported, but the exercise as a standalone intervention has not been trialed.
Sources
- Ajzen (1991), theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Common mistake
Concluding that a gravity problem is not a constraint and should be abandoned — sometimes the constraint is the right choice and should be kept; the audit is about making it a conscious choice rather than an unexamined assumption.
Practice this with IX Coach
7 days free, then $40/month (~$1.30/day).
More practices for Odyssey Plans: Designing Three Alternative Futures
- Draft three genuinely different five-year plans
Sketch three distinct five-year lives — not variations on the same theme, but genuinely different directions.
- Rate each plan on confidence, interest, and coherence
Score each plan on whether you find it engaging, whether you could execute it, and whether it fits who you are.
- Run prototyping conversations before committing to a plan
Talk to people already living your Plan B or C before you decide whether to pursue it.
- Track your life gauges: work, play, love, health
Monitor how full your "energy tanks" in four life domains are before making a major plan decision.
- Run a small experiment before committing to Plan B or C
Design the smallest possible real-world experience that would tell you something true about a plan before you commit to it.
- Build a coherent narrative across your three plans
Find the values and themes that appear across all three plans — they are your non-negotiables.
Related concepts
- The Life Crafting Intervention: Scripting Your Future Self
Structured narrative writing for self-concordant goals and engaged living
- Purpose Anchors: Keeping Meaning Accessible Day to Day
Concrete practices for keeping your larger why present when the urgent crowds it out
- Ikigai, Honestly Explained
The real concept, the diagram caveat, and practices that surface it
- Anti-Goals: Defining Success by What You Refuse to Accept
How defining what you don’t want sharpens what you actually pursue