Give experiences, not objects
Treat someone to a shared experience rather than buying them a thing.
Why it works
Experiential purchases produce more lasting happiness than material ones because they are less subject to hedonic adaptation, more integrated into personal identity, and more connected to relationships. When the experience is shared, it also becomes a piece of common history — something that can be revisited in conversation, compounding the original connection value.
How to do it
- Replace one gift idea with a shared activity: a meal, a day trip, a class you take together.
- Choose an experience that connects to something you know they already care about.
- After the experience, name one specific moment that you will both remember.
Evidence
Experiential vs material purchase happiness is well replicated: experiences resist hedonic adaptation better, and shared experiences compound through recall and shared narrative. Caprariello and Reis (2013) isolated why: it is the involvement of other people, not the experiential form per se, that drives the happiness advantage — shared experiences beat both solo experiences and material goods. (rct)
Some material gifts (that unlock capability or relieve a pain) can outperform experiences; the experiential-giving edge is a tendency, not an absolute rule.
Sources
- Van Boven & Gilovich (2003), to do or to have? That is the question, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193–1202.
- Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2013). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 199–215.
- Kumar, A., & Gilovich, T. (2015). Some "thing" to talk about? Differential story utility from experiential and material purchases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1320–1331.
- Nicolao, L., Irwin, J. R., & Goodman, J. K. (2009). Happiness for sale: Do experiential purchases make consumers happier than material purchases? Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 188–198.
Common mistake
Treating experiences as a better gift category while still choosing solo experiences the other person will have alone. The shared component is what drives the relationship payoff.
Practice this with IX Coach
7 days free, then $40/month (~$1.30/day).
More practices for Prosocial Spending: Why Giving Boosts Happiness
- Give to a named, visible person
Spend on someone specific enough that you can see or imagine their response.
- Give small amounts more often
Spread giving across frequent small acts rather than saving it for large ones.
- Give in ways that strengthen social connection
Make your giving a moment of relationship, not a transaction.
- Give proportionally to stay in a state of abundance
Give at a level that feels generous without triggering deprivation — so you can keep giving.
- Give your full attention as a form of prosocial spending
Treat undivided attention as a resource you can intentionally spend on another person.
Related concepts
- Positive Psychology, Made Practical
PERMA and the well-being exercises, graded honestly on the evidence
- Mattering: Feeling Like You Count
Why feeling significant to others is a basic psychological need — and how to cultivate it
- Active-Constructive Responding, Made Practical
The four response styles and the surprising power of celebrating good news