Values Bullseye, Made Practical
Translating abstract values into a concrete map of where to move next
What is the ACT values bullseye and how do you use it?
The values bullseye, developed by Tobias Lundgren within the ACT framework, is a visual exercise in which you rate how close your current behavior is to the bullseye in four life domains — work, relationships, personal growth, and leisure. It converts abstract values into a concrete gap-analysis, making it easier to choose one committed action that moves you toward the center. The exercise is part of the established ACT toolkit; direct evidence for the instrument is limited but the underlying ACT framework has substantial support.
Most values exercises end at naming the value. The bullseye goes further: it shows you the gap between the life you want and the life you are living — domain by domain — so you can choose one concrete step that closes it. Developed by Tobias Lundgren as part of ACT-based work, it is now widely used in ACT therapy, coaching, and sports psychology. The practices below walk through how to use it well, what the mechanism is, and where the evidence is honest.
Practices
- Map your values across the four life domains
Write one core value statement for each domain — work, relationships, personal growth, leisure — before touching the bullseye.
- Rate your current position in each domain
Mark on each domain’s bullseye how closely your recent behavior has matched the value — honestly.
- Choose one domain to move toward the bullseye this week
Pick the domain where a small move would matter most — not the most important one in the abstract.
- Turn the chosen domain into a committed action
Convert the domain insight into a concrete, timed, values-linked behavior — not a vague intention.
- Review the bullseye weekly to track real movement
Re-mark each domain every week and compare — small outward or inward shifts are your feedback loop.
- Use the bullseye to resolve competing values
When two values pull in different directions, the bullseye shows you which domain is most neglected and most in need of attention.
How these practices connect
Every practice here treats the values bullseye as a closed feedback loop rather than a one-time diagnostic: values only change behavior when they are made explicit, measured against actual conduct, acted on selectively, and re-measured. Mapping supplies the explicit target, rating supplies the honest gap, choosing and committed action supply the movement, and weekly review closes the loop back to measurement. Remove any one stage and the loop breaks — reflection without action stays aspirational, and action without re-measurement has no way to tell you whether it worked.
Do you have to write out your values before you use the bullseye?
Yes, in the sense that the bullseye needs a target before it can show you a gap. Mapping your values across the four life domains (work, relationships, personal growth, leisure) surfaces what you actually want in each area, including conflicts between domains and domains you have never explicitly thought about. Rating your current position against a value you never named is not meaningful, so this step comes first for a reason, not just as a formality.
Why does marking where you actually are feel uncomfortable?
Because the discomfort is the mechanism, not a side effect. Marking your real recent behavior against a stated value creates a visible gap between what you value and what you do, and that gap generates cognitive dissonance — a motivating tension when it's faced honestly instead of smoothed over. Because you place the mark yourself rather than being told where you stand, you're the one generating the discrepancy, which makes it harder to dismiss than if someone else pointed it out.
Should you work on all four life areas at once or just pick one?
Pick one. Trying to move all four domains at the same time creates competition for limited attention and willpower, and in practice that usually means none of them move. Choosing a single domain — specifically the one where a small move would matter most, not the one that feels most important in the abstract — preserves enough focus to make a concrete action actually happen.
Why do you feel guilty about a domain but the bullseye points you somewhere else?
Guilt tracks how bad you feel about a domain, not where a small action would do the most good, and those two things frequently diverge. The bullseye's selection criterion is leverage — where a feasible move now would matter most — which is a different question than which domain you judge most important or feel worst about neglecting. Choosing based on guilt is a common mistake precisely because it substitutes emotional weight for practical leverage.
What comes after you rate your bullseye — does anything actually have to change?
Rating the bullseye only diagnoses the gap between your values and your behavior; it does not close it. The practice that turns the diagnosis into change is converting your chosen domain into a committed action — a concrete, timed, values-linked behavior rather than a vague intention like 'be more present.' This works the same way implementation intentions do: an if-then commitment that can fire on its own rather than depending on motivation you have to find in the moment.
How do you know if the bullseye is actually working over time?
You re-mark each domain every week and compare it to the previous mark. Without that repeated re-marking, values work stays a one-off reflection with no way to tell if anything changed; the weekly review turns it into a feedback loop, where movement inward reinforces that the action is working and movement outward signals that the action or its frequency needs adjusting. It's most informative to keep doing this when things are going well, not only when you're troubleshooting a problem.
Can the bullseye help when two values conflict, like career versus family?
Yes — it reframes the conflict instead of resolving it philosophically. Rather than asking which value is more important in the abstract, the bullseye asks which domain is currently most neglected, and the most neglected domain usually has the lowest cost and highest relative benefit for a small move. That reframing is what lets you act instead of staying stuck in a debate that leaves both domains untouched while you look for a permanent answer.
How do you choose between these?
If you have never done this before, start with mapping the four domains and rating your current position — you need both before anything else makes sense. If you already have a marked bullseye and feel torn between two areas pulling at you, use it for conflict resolution: look at which domain is most neglected rather than which value wins in principle. If you know where you stand but haven't moved, the next step is choosing one domain and converting it into a committed action rather than adding more reflection. And if you've been taking action for a while but can't tell whether it's working, the weekly review is the piece that's missing — it's the only practice here that tells you, after the fact, whether what you chose actually moved anything.
What these approaches do not settle
Most of what makes the bullseye work is clinical design and mechanism-level reasoning extrapolated from broader ACT and self-determination theory, not something each specific step (the four-domain structure, the one-domain-at-a-time rule, the weekly cadence, the conflict-resolution use) has been separately trialed on. The strongest direct evidence sits with committed action, where the underlying implementation-intention mechanism has RCT support — though even there, the evidence backs the general mechanism rather than this exact bullseye-to-action format. Self-monitoring as a general practice is well supported, but the specific choice of a weekly bullseye re-marking has not been isolated and tested outside the wider ACT protocols it comes from.
Practice this with IX Coach
Related concepts
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Made Practical
The core ACT processes, the mechanisms behind them, and an honest read on the evidence
- Committed Action, Made Practical
The practices that turn values from intentions into a lived life
- Values Clarification, Made Practical
Card sorts, ranking, and value-consistent action — with an honest read on the evidence