Coaching practices for Getting to Yes Fisher Ury
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Getting to Yes Fisher Ury, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- I think they’d privately accept what I’m offering, but the way I’ve framed it they’d basically have to admit defeat to say yes
- This has turned into a pure contest of who’s more stubborn, and whoever caves first "loses"
- Every time I push for a "yes" the other person tenses up like I’m trying to trap them, and the agreements I do get crumble the moment it’s time to actually commit
- We’re treating this like there’s one pie to fight over and someone has to lose
- The numbers actually work and yet they still won’t budge, and I keep sweetening the offer to no effect
Practices that may help
- Getting to Yes: Principled Negotiation
Getting to Yes (Fisher & Ury, of the Harvard Negotiation Project) argues for negotiating on the merits instead of haggling over positions: separate people from the problem, focus on underlying interests, invent options for mutual gain, and judge outcomes by objective criteria — with your BATNA as the source of real leverage. It’s an influential framework grounded in decision theory and negotiation experience rather than a lab-tested protocol. - Principled Negotiation, Made Practical
Principled negotiation, developed by Roger Fisher and William Ury in Getting to Yes, replaces positional bargaining with a method built on four elements: separate the people from the problem, focus on interests rather than positions, generate options for mutual gain, and insist on objective criteria. It aims for agreements that are better for both parties than their alternatives — without requiring either to capitulate or play hardball. - Frame proposals as "yesable propositions"
Make your proposals easy for the counterpart to say yes to — not easy on your terms, but easy to accept as legitimate.
Principled Negotiation, Made Practical - Insist on objective criteria
Anchor the deal to independent standards — market rates, precedent, expert opinion — not willpower.
Getting to Yes: Principled Negotiation - Get to “No”, not “Yes”
Ask questions that invite a safe “No” so the other side feels in control.
Never Split the Difference, In Practice - Invent options for mutual gain
Brainstorm multiple possible deals before deciding, expanding the pie before splitting it.
Getting to Yes: Principled Negotiation - Distinguish substantive, procedural, and psychological interests
The interest behind a position is often not about the money or the terms — it may be about face, fairness, or control.
Interests vs. Positions: The Core of Integrative Negotiation - Elicit a small consistency cue before the main ask
Get a small, genuine agreement or self-description before the main request — people act consistently with what they’ve said.
Pre-Suasion, Made Practical - Separate the people from the problem
Be hard on the problem, soft on the people — attack the issue, not each other.
Getting to Yes: Principled Negotiation - Start with a minimal, easy-to-agree request
The first ask should be small enough that virtually anyone would say yes.
The Foot-in-the-Door Technique, Made Practical
Related concerns
- Getting To Yes Method
Getting to Yes (Fisher & Ury, of the Harvard Negotiation Project) argues for negotiating on the merits instead of haggling over positions: separate people from the problem, focus on underlying interests, invent options for mutual gain, and judge outcomes by objective criteria — with your BATNA as the source of real leverage. It’s an influential framework grounded in decision theory and negotiation experience rather than a lab-tested protocol.
- Getting To Yes Summary
Getting to Yes (Fisher & Ury, of the Harvard Negotiation Project) argues for negotiating on the merits instead of haggling over positions: separate people from the problem, focus on underlying interests, invent options for mutual gain, and judge outcomes by objective criteria — with your BATNA as the source of real leverage. It’s an influential framework grounded in decision theory and negotiation experience rather than a lab-tested protocol.
- Getting To Yes Principled Negotiation After A Setback
Getting to Yes (Fisher & Ury, of the Harvard Negotiation Project) argues for negotiating on the merits instead of haggling over positions: separate people from the problem, focus on underlying interests, invent options for mutual gain, and judge outcomes by objective criteria — with your BATNA as the source of real leverage. It’s an influential framework grounded in decision theory and negotiation experience rather than a lab-tested protocol.
- Getting To Yes Principled Negotiation For My Teenager
Getting to Yes (Fisher & Ury, of the Harvard Negotiation Project) argues for negotiating on the merits instead of haggling over positions: separate people from the problem, focus on underlying interests, invent options for mutual gain, and judge outcomes by objective criteria — with your BATNA as the source of real leverage. It’s an influential framework grounded in decision theory and negotiation experience rather than a lab-tested protocol.
- Getting To Yes Principled Negotiation Under Stress
Getting to Yes (Fisher & Ury, of the Harvard Negotiation Project) argues for negotiating on the merits instead of haggling over positions: separate people from the problem, focus on underlying interests, invent options for mutual gain, and judge outcomes by objective criteria — with your BATNA as the source of real leverage. It’s an influential framework grounded in decision theory and negotiation experience rather than a lab-tested protocol.
- Getting To Yes Principled Negotiation When Overwhelmed
Getting to Yes (Fisher & Ury, of the Harvard Negotiation Project) argues for negotiating on the merits instead of haggling over positions: separate people from the problem, focus on underlying interests, invent options for mutual gain, and judge outcomes by objective criteria — with your BATNA as the source of real leverage. It’s an influential framework grounded in decision theory and negotiation experience rather than a lab-tested protocol.
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.