Coaching practices for Levels of Processing
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Levels of Processing, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- I read something and immediately copy it down word-for-word and move on, and it never actually lands
- I study things in the abstract, as interesting ideas floating free of me, and they slip away
- I think I understand something until I try to actually say it out loud to someone, and then I fall apart at the parts I’d glossed over
- I keep trying to hold onto abstract principles purely as abstractions and they just decay on me
- I understand a concept in the moment but it leaves no hook to grab onto later, so it just evaporates
Practices that may help
- Levels of Processing: Why Depth of Encoding Determines What You Remember
Craik and Lockhart’s (1972) levels of processing framework proposes that memory is a by-product of the type of processing performed on incoming information: shallow processing (appearance, sound) produces weak, short-lived traces, while deep processing (meaning, elaboration, connection to prior knowledge) produces strong, durable ones. The implication for learning is that how you engage with material matters more than how many times you see it. - Process new information by its meaning, not its form
Ask what something means, how it connects to what you know, and why it matters — not just what it looks like or sounds like.
Levels of Processing: Why Depth of Encoding Determines What You Remember - Link new information to your own life and identity
Ask how the new information applies to you personally — self-referential encoding is one of the deepest processing routes known.
Levels of Processing: Why Depth of Encoding Determines What You Remember - Explain the material to someone else — real or imagined
Teaching forces you to process at the deepest level: organizing information coherently, identifying gaps, and translating to another person’s perspective.
Levels of Processing: Why Depth of Encoding Determines What You Remember - Ground abstract concepts in concrete, physical instances
An abstract concept understood only abstractly decays faster than the same concept grounded in a concrete, sensory example.
Levels of Processing: Why Depth of Encoding Determines What You Remember - Elaborate new information with examples, images, and stories
Create a specific example, a mental image, or a story connecting new information to something already meaningful to you.
Levels of Processing: Why Depth of Encoding Determines What You Remember - Recognition-speed drills
Flash configurations briefly to force pattern recognition rather than analytical reconstruction.
Chunking: How Experts See What Beginners Miss - Process notes just in time, not just in case
Refine a note only when you are about to use it for something real — not on a maintenance schedule.
Progressive Summarization, Made Practical - Read need for cognition to calibrate depth
Some people enjoy thinking through arguments; others prefer quick, clear conclusions — read the difference.
Elaboration Likelihood Model, Made Practical - Shift from abstract "why" to concrete "how"
Replace "why am I like this?" with "how can I do the next small thing?"
Rumination-Focused CBT, Made Practical
Related concerns
- Craik Lockhart Levels Of Processing
Craik and Lockhart’s (1972) levels of processing framework proposes that memory is a by-product of the type of processing performed on incoming information: shallow processing (appearance, sound) produces weak, short-lived traces, while deep processing (meaning, elaboration, connection to prior knowledge) produces strong, durable ones. The implication for learning is that how you engage with material matters more than how many times you see it.
- Deep Encoding Vs Shallow Encoding
Craik and Lockhart’s (1972) levels of processing framework proposes that memory is a by-product of the type of processing performed on incoming information: shallow processing (appearance, sound) produces weak, short-lived traces, while deep processing (meaning, elaboration, connection to prior knowledge) produces strong, durable ones. The implication for learning is that how you engage with material matters more than how many times you see it.
- Levels Of Processing Why Depth Of Encoding Determines What You Remember During Conflict
Craik and Lockhart’s (1972) levels of processing framework proposes that memory is a by-product of the type of processing performed on incoming information: shallow processing (appearance, sound) produces weak, short-lived traces, while deep processing (meaning, elaboration, connection to prior knowledge) produces strong, durable ones. The implication for learning is that how you engage with material matters more than how many times you see it.
- Deep Processing Memory
Craik and Lockhart’s (1972) levels of processing framework proposes that memory is a by-product of the type of processing performed on incoming information: shallow processing (appearance, sound) produces weak, short-lived traces, while deep processing (meaning, elaboration, connection to prior knowledge) produces strong, durable ones. The implication for learning is that how you engage with material matters more than how many times you see it.
- Elaborative Encoding
Create a specific example, a mental image, or a story connecting new information to something already meaningful to you.
Elaborate new information with examples, images, and stories
- How To Encode Information Deeply
Ask what something means, how it connects to what you know, and why it matters — not just what it looks like or sounds like.
Process new information by its meaning, not its form
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.