Coaching practices for Superforecasting at Work
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Superforecasting at Work, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- When a prediction of mine blows up, I either spiral into thinking the whole thing is pointless or I just shrug and forget it
- I catch myself shaving down the estimate I’m about to present
- Each project wraps up and I move straight on without ever writing down what I’d guessed versus what actually happened
- I commit to one confident number
- New information keeps arriving that should obviously move my estimate, but I just cling to the date I first committed to
Practices that may help
- Superforecasting
Philip Tetlock’s forecasting tournament research found that a subset of ordinary people — "superforecasters" — consistently outperform domain experts and intelligence analysts at probabilistic prediction. They share measurable cognitive and behavioral habits: they think in probabilities, update frequently on evidence, and actively seek disconfirming information. These habits are learnable. - Treat forecasting accuracy as a skill that improves with practice
Take prediction errors as performance feedback, not as proof that forecasting is futile.
Superforecasting - Reference Class Forecasting
Reference class forecasting, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky and formalized by Bent Flyvbjerg, improves forecast accuracy by anchoring on the statistical distribution of outcomes for similar past projects rather than on the details of the current one. The method reliably corrects the optimism bias that inflates cost, time, and benefit estimates in planning — the evidence base here is real and specific. - Distinguish cognitive optimism bias from strategic misrepresentation
Recognize that some forecast inflation is genuine bias and some is deliberate spin — they require different fixes.
Reference Class Forecasting - Conduct post-project debriefs to contribute to the class data
Record actual vs. forecast outcomes honestly — this builds the reference class that future forecasts depend on.
Reference Class Forecasting - Forecast a distribution, not a point estimate
Represent your forecast as a range of likely outcomes, not a single predicted number.
Reference Class Forecasting - Update your forecast incrementally as new evidence arrives
Treat your forecast as a probability that should shift with each new piece of evidence, not a commitment that survives contradiction.
Reference Class Forecasting - Use reference classes to ground personal estimates in base rates
Before estimating how your situation will unfold, find similar past situations and check what happened.
Bayesian Thinking: How to Update Beliefs Rationally - Decompose complex questions into sub-questions
Break a hard forecasting question into smaller, estimable pieces and aggregate them.
Superforecasting - Affect Forecasting: Why You Mispredicted How You’d Feel
Daniel Gilbert and colleagues showed that people reliably misjudge both the intensity and duration of their future emotional reactions — overestimating how bad bad events will feel and how good good events will feel. The mechanism is "impact bias": we focus on the event and ignore the adaptive processes that will moderate it. This research is well-replicated and has direct implications for how you make decisions, build habits, and manage expectations.
Related concerns
- Superforecasting
Philip Tetlock’s forecasting tournament research found that a subset of ordinary people — "superforecasters" — consistently outperform domain experts and intelligence analysts at probabilistic prediction. They share measurable cognitive and behavioral habits: they think in probabilities, update frequently on evidence, and actively seek disconfirming information. These habits are learnable.
- Superforecasting Techniques
Philip Tetlock’s forecasting tournament research found that a subset of ordinary people — "superforecasters" — consistently outperform domain experts and intelligence analysts at probabilistic prediction. They share measurable cognitive and behavioral habits: they think in probabilities, update frequently on evidence, and actively seek disconfirming information. These habits are learnable.
- Affect Forecasting
Daniel Gilbert and colleagues showed that people reliably misjudge both the intensity and duration of their future emotional reactions — overestimating how bad bad events will feel and how good good events will feel. The mechanism is "impact bias": we focus on the event and ignore the adaptive processes that will moderate it. This research is well-replicated and has direct implications for how you make decisions, build habits, and manage expectations.
- Deliberate Practice Forecasting
Take prediction errors as performance feedback, not as proof that forecasting is futile.
Treat forecasting accuracy as a skill that improves with practice
- How To Improve Forecasting
Reference class forecasting, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky and formalized by Bent Flyvbjerg, improves forecast accuracy by anchoring on the statistical distribution of outcomes for similar past projects rather than on the details of the current one. The method reliably corrects the optimism bias that inflates cost, time, and benefit estimates in planning — the evidence base here is real and specific.
- How To Practice Forecasting
Record actual vs. forecast outcomes honestly — this builds the reference class that future forecasts depend on.
Conduct post-project debriefs to contribute to the class data
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.