Coaching practices for Superforecasting in a New Job
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Superforecasting in a New Job, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- I’m stepping into something completely new to me, and I’ve done so much reading that I feel like an expert
- New information keeps arriving that should obviously move my estimate, but I just cling to the date I first committed to
- Once I’ve made up my mind I dig in and won’t budge until I’m absolutely certain I was wrong
- When a prediction of mine blows up, I either spiral into thinking the whole thing is pointless or I just shrug and forget it
- Each project wraps up and I move straight on without ever writing down what I’d guessed versus what actually happened
Practices that may help
- Superforecasting
Philip Tetlock’s forecasting tournament research found that a subset of ordinary people — "superforecasters" — consistently outperform domain experts and intelligence analysts at probabilistic prediction. They share measurable cognitive and behavioral habits: they think in probabilities, update frequently on evidence, and actively seek disconfirming information. These habits are learnable. - Defer heavily to base rates when entering a domain where you lack experience
In unfamiliar territory, the class distribution should almost entirely govern the forecast.
The Outside View - Update your forecast incrementally as new evidence arrives
Treat your forecast as a probability that should shift with each new piece of evidence, not a commitment that survives contradiction.
Reference Class Forecasting - Update beliefs frequently and in small increments
When new evidence arrives, adjust your probability estimate — even if the change is small.
Superforecasting - Treat forecasting accuracy as a skill that improves with practice
Take prediction errors as performance feedback, not as proof that forecasting is futile.
Superforecasting - Reference Class Forecasting
Reference class forecasting, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky and formalized by Bent Flyvbjerg, improves forecast accuracy by anchoring on the statistical distribution of outcomes for similar past projects rather than on the details of the current one. The method reliably corrects the optimism bias that inflates cost, time, and benefit estimates in planning — the evidence base here is real and specific. - Conduct post-project debriefs to contribute to the class data
Record actual vs. forecast outcomes honestly — this builds the reference class that future forecasts depend on.
Reference Class Forecasting - Decompose complex questions into sub-questions
Break a hard forecasting question into smaller, estimable pieces and aggregate them.
Superforecasting - Anchor on the base rate before adding inside-view details
Start your forecast from the class median, then adjust — do not start from your narrative and adjust to the base rate.
Reference Class Forecasting - Forecast a distribution, not a point estimate
Represent your forecast as a range of likely outcomes, not a single predicted number.
Reference Class Forecasting
Related concerns
- Superforecasting On A Budget
Philip Tetlock’s forecasting tournament research found that a subset of ordinary people — "superforecasters" — consistently outperform domain experts and intelligence analysts at probabilistic prediction. They share measurable cognitive and behavioral habits: they think in probabilities, update frequently on evidence, and actively seek disconfirming information. These habits are learnable.
- Superforecasting When Starting Out
Philip Tetlock’s forecasting tournament research found that a subset of ordinary people — "superforecasters" — consistently outperform domain experts and intelligence analysts at probabilistic prediction. They share measurable cognitive and behavioral habits: they think in probabilities, update frequently on evidence, and actively seek disconfirming information. These habits are learnable.
- How To Improve Forecasting
Reference class forecasting, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky and formalized by Bent Flyvbjerg, improves forecast accuracy by anchoring on the statistical distribution of outcomes for similar past projects rather than on the details of the current one. The method reliably corrects the optimism bias that inflates cost, time, and benefit estimates in planning — the evidence base here is real and specific.
- How To Practice Forecasting
Record actual vs. forecast outcomes honestly — this builds the reference class that future forecasts depend on.
Conduct post-project debriefs to contribute to the class data
- Novice Domain Forecasting
In unfamiliar territory, the class distribution should almost entirely govern the forecast.
Defer heavily to base rates when entering a domain where you lack experience
- Superforecasting During A Big Change
When new evidence arrives, adjust your probability estimate — even if the change is small.
Update beliefs frequently and in small increments
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.