Coaching practices for Decision Criteria
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Decision Criteria, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- I’m weighing a dozen factors on the same choice I face over and over, and they all blur together
- I sit down to choose and realize I never decided what I actually want first, so whatever options get put in front of me end up defining "good" for me
- I’ll find something that genuinely fits everything I need, and instead of taking it I keep looking
- I can never feel done deciding
- The second either of us names a solution, the other instantly shoots it down with a counter
Practices that may help
- Use "take the best": choose on your single most informative cue
When choosing between options, identify the most diagnostic cue and use it — stop searching for more.
Simple Heuristics: Gerd Gigerenzer’s Case for Fast and Frugal Thinking - Evaluate each option against your criteria before comparing options to each other
Score options independently first — so the comparison set can’t retroactively redefine what good looks like.
The Decoy Effect — How an Irrelevant Option Changes Your Choice - Set a “good enough” bar before you search
Decide your criteria first, then take the first option that clears them.
Satisficing vs. Maximizing: When “Good Enough” Wins - Adopt satisficing instead of maximizing
Set a "good enough" threshold before you search, then stop when you hit it.
Choice Overload, Made Practical - Define what success looks like together, before proposing solutions
Agree on the criteria a good solution must meet before either side proposes anything.
The Third Alternative, Made Practical - Simplify complex choices to prevent comparison fatigue from enabling decoys
Too many options increase susceptibility to decoys — constrain the comparison set before evaluating.
The Decoy Effect — How an Irrelevant Option Changes Your Choice - Define your disqualifiers in advance
Before evaluating options, decide what would automatically rule one out.
Inversion: Solve Problems Backward - Model synergy: ask "what would a solution have to look like to address both?"
Use the agreed criteria as a design brief and generate solutions that meet all of them.
The Third Alternative, Made Practical - Use the 10-year view to check values alignment
Ask: is the 10-year version of this choice consistent with what I actually care about?
The 10-10-10 Rule - Commit and stop re-evaluating
Once you’ve chosen, close the door instead of reopening the comparison.
Satisficing vs. Maximizing: When “Good Enough” Wins
Related concerns
- Decision Standards
Set a "good enough" threshold before you search, then stop when you hit it.
Adopt satisficing instead of maximizing
- Clarify Decision Criteria
When choosing between options, identify the most diagnostic cue and use it — stop searching for more.
Use "take the best": choose on your single most informative cue
- Set Criteria Before Deciding
When choosing between options, identify the most diagnostic cue and use it — stop searching for more.
- Choosing Best Solution
Rate each solution on likelihood of success, personal costs, and fit with your values.
Evaluate solutions against costs, benefits, and fit
- Decision Filter
When choosing between options, identify the most diagnostic cue and use it — stop searching for more.
- Pre Specified Criteria Decisions
Set a "good enough" threshold before you search, then stop when you hit it.
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.