Coaching practices for Review Success Not Just Failure
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For Review Success Not Just Failure, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- When something goes badly I’ll pick it apart for hours, but when something actually goes great I just enjoy it and move on without a second thought
- When I look at what went wrong this year I catch myself blaming the timing, other people, the circumstances
- I lost, so I’ve written the whole thing off as a failure
- I finally tried something and it only half-worked, and my whole brain went "see, nothing I do ever works"
- At the end of the day my failures are vivid and my wins are invisible
Practices that may help
- Apply the AAR to successes, not only setbacks
Reviewing what actually caused a win produces replicable insight; reviewing only failures produces only loss-avoidance.
After-Action Review: The US Army’s Tool for Continuous Learning - Spend more time on "what did not go well" than on what did
Failure analysis contains the most actionable information in any honest review.
The Annual Review (Tim Ferriss Method) - Review process goal execution separately from outcomes after each performance
Evaluate how well you executed your process goals independently of whether you won or lost.
Process Goals, Made Practical - Evaluate the outcome and adjust
After implementing, honestly assess what worked, what didn’t, and what to do next.
Problem-Solving Therapy, Made Practical - Balance the review with a genuine positive inventory
List three specific things you did well today — not three things that went well, but three things you did.
The Pythagorean Evening Review - Reframe feedback from outcome to process
After any outcome — good or bad — ask "what did I do well?" before "how did it go?"
The Confidence–Competence Loop - Score decision quality separately from outcome quality
Judge the process you used — not whether it worked — when you review a past decision.
Decision Journaling: Learning to Decide Better Over Time - Treat setbacks as information, not identity
Read failure as feedback on the approach, not a verdict on you.
Growth Mindset: The Honest Version - Canonical contrast after failure
After your attempts, examine the expert solution specifically for what your approaches were missing.
Productive Failure: How Struggling First Makes Instruction More Effective - Apply attributional retraining to success as well as failure
Attribute genuine successes to stable, internal, and global factors — not to luck or circumstance alone.
Attributional Retraining, Made Practical
Related concerns
- Reappraise Failure
Reviewing what actually caused a win produces replicable insight; reviewing only failures produces only loss-avoidance.
Apply the AAR to successes, not only setbacks
- What Went Well Analysis
Reviewing what actually caused a win produces replicable insight; reviewing only failures produces only loss-avoidance.
- When Process Goals Post Performance Goal Review
Evaluate how well you executed your process goals independently of whether you won or lost.
Review process goal execution separately from outcomes after each performance
- Review Action Not Outcome
Reviewing what actually caused a win produces replicable insight; reviewing only failures produces only loss-avoidance.
- What Did Not Go Well
After a disappointing outcome, ask: did I act well? If yes, the discipline is complete — the outcome is not the measure.
Review actions through the reserve clause lens
- What Went Well What Did Not
After a disappointing outcome, ask: did I act well? If yes, the discipline is complete — the outcome is not the measure.
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.