Share information to unlock value
Reveal interests (not your bottom line) so both sides can find the better deal.
Why it works
Integrative deals require knowing each other’s priorities, but total secrecy blocks that discovery while full disclosure invites exploitation. The resolution is reciprocal sharing of interests and priorities — not reservation prices — which lets you find joint gains while protecting your claiming position.
How to do it
- Share your interests and relative priorities, while guarding your walk-away number.
- Offer information reciprocally — give a little, invite the same, build trust incrementally.
- Use packaged offers, which reveal priorities through the trades without exposing limits.
Evidence
Research finds information exchange about interests and priorities improves the odds of reaching integrative agreements; pure secrecy tends to produce worse joint outcomes. Thompson’s information-exchange experiments isolate the mechanism: sharing priorities (not reservation prices) raises joint gains, while withholding them leaves compatible trades undiscovered. (observational)
Over-disclosure (revealing your reservation price) hands away your claiming power; the skill is sharing interests, not limits.
Sources
- Thompson, L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 161–179.
- Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 621–633.
Common mistake
Either hoarding all information (so no joint gains surface) or oversharing your bottom line (so you get exploited in the split).
Practice this with IX Coach
7 days free, then $40/month (~$1.30/day).
More practices for Win-Win Thinking: Expanding the Pie
- Reject the fixed-pie assumption
Stop assuming your gain must be their loss — most negotiations have hidden joint gains.
- Trade across differing priorities
Give on what you value less to get what you value more — and have them do the same.
- Add issues to expand the pie
Bring more variables in — timing, scope, future work — so there’s more to trade.
- Bridge disagreements with contingent terms
When you disagree about the future, bet on it — tie terms to what actually happens.
- Create value first, then claim your share
Expand the pie before you fight over slices — but don’t forget to take your slice.