Run a five-element check-in on one real situation
Take a situation you are stuck on and ask one question for each AQAL element to find the piece you have been leaving out.
Pourquoi ça marche
People tend to explain a problem with the kind of cause they are most used to — feelings, behaviour, culture or systems — and stop there. AQAL’s five elements work as a fixed list of question types, so the check does not depend on remembering what you habitually skip. Esbjörn-Hargens describes integral practitioners using the quadrants as a "first move" to scan a situation before acting, and then adding levels, lines, states and types.
Comment faire
- Write one sentence describing a situation you are stuck on — a conflict, a decision, a habit that will not change.
- Quadrants: write one line each for what is going on inside you (I), in the shared meanings and relationships around it (we), in behaviour and the body (it), and in the systems, rules and money involved (its).
- Levels: ask whether the situation is asking more maturity or complexity of someone than they currently have.
- Lines: ask which of your capacities — thinking, feeling, relating, moral judgment — is doing the work and which is lagging.
- States: ask what passing state (tired, angry, elated, hungry) is shaping how this looks today.
- Types: ask whether a difference in style is being mistaken for someone being wrong.
- Circle the one line you wrote that surprised you. That is where to look next.
Données probantes
The five elements and the advice to scan the quadrants first are set out in Esbjörn-Hargens’s overview of integral theory and in Wilber’s own short introduction, The Integral Vision (2007). Both describe the framework’s use in practice; neither reports a controlled test of the check-in itself. Its support is practitioner experience. (anecdotal)
No study has tested whether running through the five elements leads to better decisions or outcomes. Both sources are written by proponents of the framework.
Sources
- Esbjörn-Hargens, S. (2010). An Overview of Integral Theory: An All-Inclusive Framework for the Twenty-First Century. In S. Esbjörn-Hargens (Ed.), Integral Theory in Action: Applied, Theoretical, and Constructive Perspectives on the AQAL Model. SUNY Press. (First circulated as Integral Institute Resource Paper No. 1, 2009.)
- Wilber, K. (2007). The Integral Vision: A Very Short Introduction to the Revolutionary Integral Approach to Life, God, the Universe, and Everything. Shambhala.
Erreur fréquente
Filling every box at equal length and calling it done. The value is in the one element you had nothing to say about, not in a tidy completed grid.
Pratiquez cela avec IX Coach
Plus de pratiques pour Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (AQAL), Made Practical
- Check whether you are flattening an inside into an outside
Notice when you explain something felt or shared only by its measurable correlates — or the reverse — and put the missing side back.
- Ask how you know it: first, second or third person
Sort what you believe about a situation by how you came to know it — your own experience, talking with others, or outside observation.
- Find what each side gets right before deciding
When two views clash, write down the part of each that is true before arguing for either one.
- Tell a passing state from a lasting stage
After a powerful experience, separate what you glimpsed in a state from how you actually make sense of things day to day.
- Sketch where your development is uneven
Draw a rough bar chart of your capacities — thinking, feeling, relating, moral judgment, body — to see where you are strong and where you lag.
- Separate a difference in style from a difference in maturity
When someone does things differently, ask whether it is a type — a stable style — before treating it as less developed.
- Read the critics and hold the model lightly
Before you rely on AQAL, read a serious critique of it, so the map stays a tool rather than a belief.
Concepts associés
- La dynamique spirale, rendue pratique
Comprendre comment les systèmes de valeurs se développent et comment naviguer entre eux
- La théorie sujet-objet de Kegan, en pratique
Passer d'être mené par ses présupposés à pouvoir les examiner
- Terri O’Fallon’s STAGES Model, Made Practical
Twelve stages built from three repeating questions, and how to work with the one you are in
- Le travail de l'ombre
Rencontrer les parties de vous-même que vous avez ignorées
- L'Ennéagramme
Utiliser le type comme un prisme, pas une étiquette
- Le modèle des Big Five de la personnalité
Ce que la meilleure science de la personnalité validée vous dit réellement sur vous-même