Sweep one question through all eight zones
Take one real question and write what an answer looks like from the inside and the outside of each of the four quadrants.
Perché funziona
Bowman describes the eight zones as eight different perspectives on the four quadrants, drawn from Wilber’s Integral Spirituality (2006, pp. 36–40; Bowman 2014, p. 31). Bowman also describes Wilber’s model as including partial truths that are examined in context with other disciplines (2014, p. 35). The sweep is this page’s practical device for doing that examination on one question: write what each zone shows, then read the eight answers together.
Come farlo
- Write one concrete question about a situation you are in now, in a single sentence.
- Draw a two-by-two grid for the four quadrants: individual and collective across the top, inside and outside down the side.
- In each of the four boxes, write two short answers: one from the inside (what it is like, what it means to those inside it) and one from the outside (what can be observed or counted).
- Read all eight answers together. Mark the two that were hardest to write, and note what you would need to find out to fill them.
Prove scientifiche
The eight zones are Wilber’s framework, and Bowman describes them in Wilber’s terms (2014, pp. 31, 35). No study has tested whether a zone-by-zone sweep improves an answer or a decision compared with other ways of working through a problem. (anecdotal)
The mechanism is described in the source but not demonstrated here. Bowman argues that Wilber uses the inside-outside and interior-exterior terms inconsistently (pp. 31, 54), so the boundaries between zones are not always clear.
Fonti
- Wilber, K. (2006). Integral Spirituality: A Startling New Role for Religion in the Modern and Postmodern World. Boston: Integral Books.
- Bowman, K. J. (2014). Correcting Improper Uses of Perspectives, Pronouns, and Dualities in Wilberian Integral Theory: An Application of Holarchical Field Theory. Integral Review, 10(1).
Errore comune
Treating the eight boxes as eight separate facts to add up, rather than eight angles on one question that have to be read together.
Metti in pratica questo con IX Coach
Altre pratiche per Integral Methodological Pluralism: The Eight Zones of Inquiry
- Describe one experience from the inside, then from the outside
Write what an experience was like for you, then write what someone in the room could have observed, and keep the two accounts separate.
- Run one inquiry in first, second and third person
Study one question three ways: in your own notes, with the few people directly involved, and through a wider source that none of you controls.
- Match the method to the question before you gather anything
Before collecting data, decide what kind of question you are asking, so a question about meaning is not answered with a count.
- Find the empty zone in an explanation you already hold
Check one explanation you rely on against all eight zones, so the boxes it says nothing about become visible.
- Examine two conflicting views in context before deciding
When two views of the same thing conflict, name what each one is looking at before deciding which one is right.
Concetti correlati
- Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (AQAL), Made Practical
Five elements for catching what your view of a situation leaves out, held as a map rather than a truth
- Using Wilber’s Four Quadrants on a Real Problem
Eight ways to put the I, It, We, Its map to work on a problem you actually have
- First, Second, Third and Fourth Person Perspectives
How the number of viewpoints you can hold grows, what the research does and does not show, and how to practice it in a real disagreement
- States vs Stages of Consciousness: Wilber, Combs and O’Fallon
Why a powerful experience and a lasting change are different things, and how each one grows
- Torbert’s Seven Action Logics of Leadership
Seven ways leaders make sense of pressure, how common each is, and how to work with your own