Find the split and give each side a chair

Catch the moment one part of you is judging or pressuring another, and set the two sides apart in two chairs.

Why it works

Greenberg's method starts from a marker: a statement in which one part of the self evaluates or coerces another ("I'm so stupid for doing that", "I should be over this"). As long as both sides speak through one voice, the person only feels the bad mood the split produces. Putting each side in its own chair turns a single knot into two speakers who can address each other, which is what lets feeling and meaning move. Early studies found that two-chair work applied at such a split deepened experiencing more than empathic reflection or focusing did.

How to do it

  1. Notice the sentence that has a judge and a judged in it ("I'm pathetic for still being upset"). Write it down word for word.
  2. Set two chairs facing each other. Decide which chair is for the part that criticizes or pushes, and which is for the part on the receiving end.
  3. Before speaking, name each side in plain words: "the part that says I'm lazy" and "the part that feels tired and crushed".
  4. Start in the critic's chair, since in Greenberg's sequence the critic speaks first.

Evidence

Greenberg, Rice and Elliott set out two-chair dialogue at a self-evaluative split as a task in their 1993 manual, and Elliott and colleagues describe the conflict-split marker in their training text. In an analogue study with 16 participants acting as their own controls, the two-chair operation at a conflict marker produced deeper experiencing and more change in awareness than empathic reflection, with no difference in goal attainment; a second study with 42 counselling students found deeper experiencing than focusing plus empathic reflection. A 2026 systematic review of 22 randomized trials of chair work in many forms and therapies reported effects from small to large. (clinical)

The early studies are small analogue experiments that measured in-session depth of feeling, not lasting change. The 2026 review pools chair work of every kind (including empty-chair work), so it is evidence for chair work in general, not for this step.

Sources

Common mistake

Setting up a split that is really a disagreement with another person ("my mother thinks I'm lazy"). If the critic belongs to someone else, that is empty-chair work; two-chair work is for the voice that has become your own.

Practice this with IX Coach

Start with IX Coach

More practices for Two-Chair Dialogue: Working With the Inner Critic and Other Inner Splits

Related concepts

Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0: cite or embed this practice · more practices graded Established clinical practice