Look at a problem as a whole and as a part
When you are pulled between your own needs and a group’s, describe the situation once from each face of the holon.
Warum es wirkt
Koestler described each holon as Janus-faced: toward the levels below it acts as a self-contained whole, toward the level above it acts as a part, and its behavior is a tension between self-assertive tendencies and integrative ones. Organization researchers use the same lens: any unit is at once a whole made of parts and a part of a larger whole. Naming both faces in a real conflict shows that the pull in two directions is built into belonging to anything, not a sign that something is wrong with you.
So gehst du vor
- Pick a situation where your needs and a group’s needs are pulling against each other — a team, a family, a friendship.
- Write a paragraph as the whole: what you need to stay intact, healthy and yourself.
- Write a paragraph as the part: what the larger whole needs from you to function.
- Look for the one move that serves both, even partly; if none exists, decide which face to favor this time and say so openly.
Evidenz
Koestler introduced the holon and holarchy in 1967 (Mella & Gazzola, 2017). Gould’s 1978 review of Koestler’s later book Janus describes his holons as Janus-like and summarizes the tension between self-assertive tendencies and integrative urges. Mella and Gazzola apply the holonic view to organizations and firms. Using it on personal conflicts is an application, not something those authors tested. (mechanistic)
The holon is a descriptive concept, not a decision rule; it does not tell you which side should win. The personal-conflict use here is an extension of Koestler’s biological and social examples.
Quellen
- Koestler, A. (1967). The Ghost in the Machine. Macmillan.
- Gould, S. J. (1978, April 20). Koestler’s Solution [Review of Janus: A Summing Up, by A. Koestler]. The New York Review of Books.
- Mella, P., & Gazzola, P. (2017). The Holonic View of Organizations and Firms. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(3), 354–374.
Häufiger Fehler
Treating the integrative pull as the mature one and the self-assertive pull as selfish. In Koestler’s picture a healthy holon needs both; either one running unchecked causes trouble.
Übe das mit IX Coach
Weitere Übungen für Holons, Holarchy and “Transcend and Include”, Made Practical
- Ask what each earlier self gave you, and what you dropped
Walk back through the people you have been and list, for each, one capacity you kept and one you left behind.
- Reclaim one capacity you cut off on the way “up”
Pick one capacity you disowned while becoming more mature — feeling, play, need, belonging — and give it a small, regular place again.
- Release the old identity, keep what it built in you
When you leave a role, faith, team or culture behind, separate the identity you are letting go of from the capacities it gave you.
- Treat the stages you outgrew with respect when you meet them in others
Notice contempt for people who see the world the way you used to, and treat it as a sign of exclusion rather than growth.
- Check whether a hierarchy you are in grows people or dominates them
Ask whether the ranking you live inside exists to build people’s capacities or to keep power where it is.
- Notice when one part of you is running the whole
Spot the part of your life — work self, achiever, rational mind — that has taken over and is crowding the rest out.
Verwandte Konzepte
- Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (AQAL), Made Practical
Five elements for catching what your view of a situation leaves out, held as a map rather than a truth
- Systemdenken
Struktur statt Ereignisse sehen – und die Hebelwirkung, die daraus entsteht
- Kegans Subjekt-Objekt-Theorie, praktisch erklärt
Vom Beherrschtwerden durch die eigenen Annahmen zur Fähigkeit, sie zu untersuchen
- Spiral Dynamics, praktisch angewendet
Verstehen, wie sich Wertesysteme entwickeln, und wie man zwischen ihnen navigiert
- Schattenarbeit
Den Teilen von dir begegnen, die du bisher ignoriert hast