Diagram a complementary or crossed transaction
Draw the ego states behind each line of an exchange to see why it flowed or why it broke down.
Por qué funciona
Berne called the unit of conversation a transaction: a stimulus from one person's ego state and a response from the other's. When the response comes from the ego state that was addressed and goes back to the one that sent it, the transaction is complementary, and by his first rule of communication it can go on indefinitely. When the response comes from a different ego state, the transaction is crossed, and communication breaks off until someone shifts. Drawing the lines between two sets of P-A-C circles turns a confusing argument into something you can see.
Cómo hacerlo
- Draw two stacks of three circles side by side, labelled P, A and C, one stack for you and one for the other person.
- Take the first line of a recent exchange. Draw an arrow from the ego state it came from to the ego state it was aimed at.
- Draw the reply the same way. If the reply arrow runs straight back along the same path, it is complementary; if it comes from or goes to a different circle, it is crossed.
- Mark the exact line where the conversation changed direction. That is almost always the crossed transaction.
Evidencia
Transactions, the rules of communication and the P-A-C diagram are set out in Berne's 1961 book and in Games People Play, and are taught in Stewart and Joines's textbook. This is the core analytic method of TA, used in therapy, training and organisations, not a separately tested intervention. (clinical)
There is no controlled study of diagramming transactions on its own; its value rests on clinical and training use. Assigning ego states to someone else's words is a guess about them, best held lightly.
Fuentes
- Berne, E. (1961). Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Individual and Social Psychiatry. Grove Press.
- Berne, E. (1964). Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships. Grove Press.
- Stewart, I., & Joines, V. (1987). TA Today: A New Introduction to Transactional Analysis. Lifespace Publishing.
Error común
Using the diagram to prove who started it. A crossed transaction is not a fault; it is information about where the exchange changed, and either person can be the one who crossed it.
Practica esto con IX Coach
Más prácticas para Transactional Analysis: The Parent, Adult and Child in Every Conversation
- Recognise which ego state is speaking
Catch whether your words, tone and posture are coming from your Parent, your Adult or your Child.
- Draw your egogram
Sketch a bar chart of how much time you spend in each ego state, and see which one to grow.
- Cross a stuck exchange from the Adult
When the same parent-and-child exchange keeps going, answer from your Adult on purpose to change its course.
- Read the ulterior message and name the game
Notice when what is said and what is meant differ, and spot the familiar exchange that ends in the same bad feeling.
- Break one rule of the stroke economy
Ask for, accept or give the recognition you usually hold back, one rule at a time.
- Find your corner of the OK Corral
Place an encounter on Ernst's grid of I'm OK / You're OK to see how it ended and where it came from.
- Trace a script decision back to childhood
Find the early conclusion about yourself that a repeating pattern keeps obeying, and see that it was a decision.
Conceptos relacionados
- Trabajo con la sombra
Encontrarte con las partes de ti mismo que has estado ignorando
- The Karpman Drama Triangle: Persecutor, Rescuer, Victim and the Way Out
Seeing the blamer, the fixer and the helpless one in a conflict, and how each corner can be answered another way
- Sistemas de la Familia Interna (IFS), en la Práctica
El modelo de partes, los mecanismos detrás de él, y una lectura honesta de una base de evidencia emergente
- Terapia de Esquemas: Sanando Creencias Mal Adaptativas Tempranas
Esquemas mal adaptativos tempranos, modos de esquema y las prácticas que gradualmente los sanan