Rewrite the worry as what you are committed to preventing

Turn each worry into a commitment — "I am committed to not…" — so you can see what your behavior is protecting.

なぜ効果があるのか

Kegan and Lahey’s final diagnostic question is: by engaging in the undermining behavior, what worrisome outcome are you committed to preventing? Rewriting a passive fear as an active commitment changes what the second-column behaviors mean. They stop looking like failures of will and start looking like sensible actions in service of a second goal. The authors call these competing commitments a natural form of self-protection rather than a weakness, which is what makes them possible to look at honestly.

やり方

  1. Take each worry and rewrite it: "I am committed to not…" — for example, "I am committed to not being seen as someone who can’t handle it."
  2. Read your goal, your behaviors and these commitments side by side.
  3. Check the fit: do the behaviors now make complete sense as ways of keeping this commitment? If not, go back to the worry box.
  4. Notice that the goal and the protective commitment are both real. You are not trying to get rid of either yet.

エビデンス

The question and the description of competing commitments as "a perfectly natural and reasonable human impulse" toward self-protection come from Kegan and Lahey’s 2001 HBR article. Reams (2009) reports that when his group made this reframe, their listed behaviors suddenly made sense to them as protection rather than failure. This is the authors’ clinical-consulting observation, not a measured effect. (mechanistic)

The fit check is judged by the person; there is no external test that the commitment found is the "right" one.

出典

よくある間違い

Writing a flattering commitment ("I am committed to high standards"). The ones that unlock the map are usually ones you are not proud of, such as being committed to not being disliked.

IX Coach でこれを実践する

IX Coach を始める

The Immunity to Change Process, Step by Step の実践法をもっと見る

関連する概念