Process Work: Process-Oriented Coaching
Process Work, developed by Arnold Mindell, is a process-oriented approach to coaching that follows the signals a person gives, such as body sensations, dream images and shifts in a conflict, and works with where they point. It grows out of the process-oriented psychology Mindell set out, and the method is taught under a trademarked name. A search for outcome studies of the approach itself found none, so the research described here is adjacent to it.
What it is
In process-oriented coaching, the coach pays attention to what happens in the room and in your body as well as to what you say. Experiences that seem to come from nowhere, such as a sensation, an image in a dream or a sudden change of tone, are treated as information about what is trying to happen. The coach follows that information with you rather than setting the agenda.
Arnold Mindell called this process-oriented psychology and described its history and theory in a 2018 article (Mindell, 2018). Its central idea is that a problem can be a signal the person is not yet hearing, and that noticing and following the signal can change how the problem feels. The vocabulary is specialist, so a session can seem unusual to someone who expects a goal-led conversation.
Where it comes from
Arnold Mindell's process-oriented psychology grew out of his work on dreams and the body, which he sets out in a 2018 article on the history and theory of the approach (Mindell, 2018).
Mindell later applied the same ideas to conflict, and he has described the approach in his own words (Mindell, 2003; Mindell, 2018).
The principles underneath
Follow the signal
A sensation, an image in a dream or a sudden change of tone is treated as information about what is trying to happen. The coach asks where it leads rather than what it means.
Start where the person is
Work begins with whatever is present, even when it does not fit the topic that was brought into the session.
Check, do not interpret
The coach describes what they notice and checks it with you. Interpretations are offered as questions rather than conclusions about your inner life.
Conflict as information
A conflict between people, or between parts of one person, is treated as a process to be understood rather than a fault to be assigned (Mindell, 2003).
How a session runs
- You begin with what is on your mind or in your body now, even if it does not match the topic you planned to bring.
- The coach reflects back shifts in your voice, posture or images, and asks what they might be pointing toward.
- When something is hard to put into words, the coach may invite you to explore it through an image, a movement or staying with a sensation, at a pace you can manage.
- The coach moves between the feeling and the story about it, checking each time that you still recognise what has come up.
- The session ends with what has become clearer and what you want to take further, without a fixed plan.
When it tends to fit
- A physical sensation keeps coming back, and explaining it away has not made it go.
- The same conflict replays with the same people, and the usual explanations have not changed it.
- A dream or an image keeps returning, and you want to see what it might be showing you.
What the research shows
Evidence: Practitioner tradition — little or no outcome research
A Europe PMC search on 2026-10-15 for the approach's name and for process-oriented psychology found no outcome study of the method. The research cited here is adjacent. Mehling et al. (2012) developed a questionnaire for interoceptive awareness, the ability to notice bodily signals, which this approach also relies on. That paper describes how the measure was built and does not test process-oriented work. The sources on Mindell's own writing describe the approach and its history; they are not controlled studies.
Where the evidence is thin: The approach has no controlled study behind it that this page can cite, and its own writing has not been checked against independent research.
Sources
- Mindell, A. (2003). Short recipe for resolving conflict crises. Psychotherapy and Politics International.
- Mindell, A. (2018). Dream Body /Dreambody on the History and Theory of Processor-Oriented Psychology. Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry.
- Mehling, W. E., et al. (2012). The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE.
Where it stops
Process-oriented work can bring up strong feelings and older material. If you have experienced trauma, or if low mood or anxiety does not ease, a qualified psychotherapist is better placed to work with it.
Much of what is written about the approach comes from its developers (Mindell, 2003; Mindell, 2018), and its specialist vocabulary can make claims hard to test. Treat its claims as practitioner views until independent studies are available.
Practices for this approach
- Interoception, Explained
Sensing the inner body — and why it underwrites emotion and self-regulation
- Focusing and the Felt Sense, Made Practical
Listening to the body’s pre-verbal knowledge — the six steps and their mechanisms
- Somatic Tracking, Made Practical
Using curious, non-fearful attention to signals in the body to rewire the fear-pain loop