Compare how different people describe the same kind of state
Read or listen to several descriptions of a similar experience and notice how the vocabulary changes with the person’s way of seeing.
Warum es wirkt
O’Fallon (2020) reports word studies of sentence completions — first 275,000 words, then 1.1 million — in which particular state words appeared consistently at particular stages: "focus" and "concentration" at one, "aware" at the next, "aware of aware" after that, and "timeless and boundless" at the latest. Whatever their final status, the observation that the language for states shifts with stage gives a reason to treat differing descriptions as different lenses rather than necessarily different experiences.
So gehst du vor
- Collect three or four descriptions of a similar experience — from friends, a book, a podcast, or your own journal from years ago.
- Underline the key words each one uses: focus, presence, God, energy, awareness, nothing, everything.
- Ask what each person seems to be treating as the most real thing in the description.
- Notice which description you instinctively rank as more advanced, and ask what that ranking says about your own lens.
Evidenz
The word studies are reported in O’Fallon (2020) from the STAGES research database; she reports that common state words and their synonyms consistently arise at particular stages. The studies are summarized in the paper rather than published in full, and the comparison exercise is untested. (mechanistic)
The word studies come from the model’s author, who is a partner in a company built on the model, and their methods are only briefly described. Vocabulary also reflects culture, religion and education, not only stage.
Quellen
Häufiger Fehler
Using the vocabulary to rank people. Someone who says "God" and someone who says "awareness" may differ in background far more than in development.
Übe das mit IX Coach
Weitere Übungen für States vs Stages of Consciousness: Wilber, Combs and O’Fallon
- Ask of any shift: is this a state or a stage?
Test a change you have noticed in yourself against the difference between something that comes and goes and something that holds on an ordinary day.
- Notice the story you told about the experience
Separate what you actually experienced from the meaning you gave it, because the meaning comes from the stage you interpreted it through.
- Train the state regularly and look for the trait
Practice consistently, and judge it by what changes between sessions rather than by how good the sessions feel.
- Integrate an experience by tracking the weeks after it
Choose one ordinary situation and watch how you behave in it for several weeks after a strong experience or a period of practice.
- Don’t use states as proof of development
Keep the depth of anyone’s experiences — including your own — separate from judgments about how mature they are.
- Run two tracks: state training and stage work
Pair regular state practice with deliberate work on how you make meaning, because O’Fallon proposes the first is necessary but not sufficient for the second.
Verwandte Konzepte
- Terri O’Fallon’s STAGES Model, Made Practical
Twelve stages built from three repeating questions, and how to work with the one you are in
- Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (AQAL), Made Practical
Five elements for catching what your view of a situation leaves out, held as a map rather than a truth
- Nicht-duales Gewahrsein, praktisch angewandt
Mühelose Achtsamkeit und das Erkennen offener, gewahrer Präsenz
- Kegans Subjekt-Objekt-Theorie, praktisch erklärt
Vom Beherrschtwerden durch die eigenen Annahmen zur Fähigkeit, sie zu untersuchen
- Offenes Gewahrsein (Open Monitoring) Meditation, praktisch erklärt
Wahlfreies Gewahrsein, offene Präsenz und die Wissenschaft empfänglicher Aufmerksamkeit
- Peak Experiences und Selbstverwirklichung
Maslows Momente der Lebendigkeit – und wie man sie häufiger macht