Huayan Buddhism and Indra’s Net: Mutual Containment in the Flower Ornament School
The Flower Ornament school’s teaching that every thing contains every other thing, and how its contemplations work
What is Indra’s net in Huayan Buddhism?
Indra’s net is the image the Chinese Huayan school (Japanese Kegon, Korean Hwaeom) uses for how phenomena relate: a vast net strung with jewels, where each jewel reflects every other jewel, so each one contains the reflections of all the rest. The school’s teaching of interpenetration comes from the Avataṃsaka (Flower Ornament) Sūtra and is developed through the patriarchs Dushun, Zhiyan, Fazang, Chengguan and Zongmi: any single thing is what it is only through the whole web of others, and the whole web is present in it. The net image is the school’s way of picturing that teaching. Those are the school’s own claims, stated in its texts; they are philosophy and contemplation rather than tested psychology.
Huayan (Chinese; Kegon in Japanese, Hwaeom in Korean) is the Buddhist school built on the Avataṃsaka Sūtra, the Flower Ornament Scripture, a very long Mahāyāna text whose vision is of a cosmos in which buddhas, bodhisattvas and ordinary beings interpenetrate without obstruction. The school’s traditional line runs from Dushun through Zhiyan (602–668), who taught Fazang, to Fazang (643–712), the third patriarch and its systematizer. Fazang’s letters with the Korean monk Ŭisang, who was also a disciple of Zhiyan, and his teaching of the Korean monk Shimsang, who helped carry the school to Japan, are part of how it spread across East Asia. The image most associated with it is Indra’s net, which the school uses to picture mutual containment. Francis Cook’s study of the school, Hua-yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra, is the standard English introduction. The practices below follow the school’s own texts and its commentators, and say plainly where the evidence is historical or philosophical rather than experimental.
実践法
- Indra’s net reflection: one object containing its conditions
Take one ordinary object or event and trace how it holds the reflections of its causes, its makers and the people it touches, until the boundary you started with looks porous.
- The golden lion: form and its substance
Take a figure that has a clear shape, and contemplate how it is made of one substance that does not change when the shape is broken or remade.
- The four dharmadhatus as a reflective sequence
Move through four ways of seeing the same world, from phenomena, to principle, to the two ways they do not obstruct each other, as a sequence of attention rather than a ranking.
- Samantabhadra’s ten vows as an aspiration practice
Read the Avataṃsaka’s closing vows of the bodhisattva Samantabhadra as ten aspirations to act, and use them to shape what you intend to do with your practice.
- Seeing mutual containment in work and home
In an ordinary relationship or task, notice the parts of other people’s lives that are present in what you do, and what your choices contain of them.
- Choosing between Huayan and interbeing for a given moment
When two Buddhist ways of seeing dependence both seem right, use a small set of questions to see which one fits the situation in front of you.
これらの実践のつながり
Each thing is what it is through its relations, and those relations are present in it. Huayan calls this mutual containment or interpenetration. Each practice on the page makes one face of it concrete: the net in one object, the lion and gold in one form, the four views in one event, the vows in one intention, the containment in one relationship, and the choice between lenses in one moment.
Which Huayan practice works directly with the image of Indra’s net?
The Indra’s net reflection practice works with the image directly: one ordinary object is traced through the conditions it depends on, until its boundary looks like a meeting point rather than a self-standing unit. The golden lion and the four dharmadhatus approach the same teaching from other angles, with form and substance and with four views of the same world.
How is the golden lion teaching different from Indra’s net?
Indra’s net shows many things reflecting one another. The golden lion shows one substance appearing as many forms: Fazang uses a gold lion to show that the lion’s shape is real and that it is gold, and that the gold is the lion’s nature. The two teachings are complementary, and the golden lion is more about form and substance than about reflection.
What are the four dharmadhatus in Huayan Buddhism?
The four dharmadhatus are four realms of reality: the realm of phenomena, the realm of principle, the non-obstruction of principle and phenomena, and the non-obstruction of phenomena with phenomena. The four-realm scheme is traditionally associated with the Huayan patriarchs; this page could not verify which one first set it out. The practice treats the four as views to move through, not as stages to finish.
What are Samantabhadra’s ten vows in the Flower Ornament Sūtra?
The ten vows that close the Avataṃsaka Sūtra are: to pay homage to all buddhas, praise them, make offerings, repent of obstacles, rejoice in others’ merit, request the teaching, invite the buddhas to remain, follow the buddhas’ example, accord with living beings, and dedicate all merit. They are aspirations to act, and the Pure Land Buddhism translation lists them in this order.
How does Huayan Buddhism relate to interbeing and dependent origination?
Huayan mutual containment, interbeing and dependent origination all describe how things depend on one another. Huayan is a metaphysics of interpenetration built on a cosmic image, interbeing is a practical ethic of seeing one’s own life inside others’, and dependent origination is a causal account of suffering. The choosing practice treats them as lenses to pick among for a given situation.
どれを選べばよいか
If the question is how a thing is built, begin with the golden lion or Indra’s net. If the question is what to do with a relationship or a task, begin with mutual containment at work and home. If the question is about the sequence of seeing, begin with the four dharmadhatus. If the question is about intention, begin with the vows.
これらのアプローチでは解決できないこと
Almost all of this page is the school’s own teaching and its historical record, and none of the contemplations has been tested in a controlled study. This page could not verify which Huayan patriarch first set out the four-realm scheme. I could not find a freely fetchable full English translation of Fazang’s Treatise on the Golden Lion, so the page draws on secondary descriptions. The school’s relation to Chan and Zen, including the work on Zongmi, is a separate subject this page does not cover.
IX Coach でこれを実践する
関連する概念
- 縁起:苦しみはどのように生じ、消えるのか
苦しみがどのように自らを維持するかの地図としての十二支の連鎖——そしてそこから降りる場所
- Engaged Buddhism: Interbeing, the Mindfulness Trainings and Practice in the World
How Thích Nhất Hạnh and Buddhist movements across Asia joined meditation and social action — and how it is practised
- Śūnyatā: Emptiness and the Two Truths in Madhyamaka
Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way: why nothing has a fixed essence, and why that is not the same as nothing
- Buddha-Nature (Tathāgatagarbha): A Buddha Hidden in Every Being
The Mahāyāna teaching that a buddha is already present in every being, and how practitioners work with it