Share responsibility for objectives and keep the accountability
Hand real ownership of objectives and coordination to your team, and be explicit about the accountability you keep as the formal leader.
Pourquoi ça marche
The book says managers at the Pre-expert level (the level below Expert, which the book estimates about 10 percent of managers still occupy), the Expert level and the Achiever level, about 90 percent of all managers, operate from a “heroic” mind-set, assuming sole responsibility for setting objectives, coordinating subordinates and managing performance. It says heroic leadership “overcontrols and underutilizes subordinates,” and discourages people from feeling responsible beyond their assigned area, although it “can be highly effective in certain situations.” Leaders beyond the Achiever level “retain the ultimate accountability and authority” of a formal role while building teams with shared commitment and responsibility.
Comment faire
- List the objectives you currently set alone and the decisions you coordinate yourself, one line each.
- Choose one objective and ask the people who will carry it to draft the path to it, while you state plainly what you still decide.
- Give one person ownership of a piece you would normally manage, and agree in advance what you will review.
- Watch whether people take responsibility beyond their own area, and name it when they do.
Données probantes
The heroic and post-heroic distinction, and the statement that heroic leadership overcontrols subordinates, come from the book’s first chapter. The excerpt attributes the distinction to Bradford and Cohen’s Power Up. The authors present the model as a description of leadership and do not, in the sources read, test whether shared responsibility improves team outcomes. (anecdotal)
Shared responsibility is presented as needed for sustained success in complex environments. That is the authors’ argument, and this page cannot confirm it from the sources it reads.
Sources
Erreur fréquente
Mistaking shared commitment for abdication. The book keeps ultimate accountability and authority with the formal leader, so sharing the work does not mean handing the accountability away.
Pratiquez cela avec IX Coach
Plus de pratiques pour Leadership Agility: The Five Levels, Explained
- Balance assertive and accommodative styles in one-on-one conversations
In a one-on-one disagreement, notice whether you are pressing your view or holding back to keep the peace, and practice moving between the two as the situation calls for.
- Scan the environment before you choose and scope an initiative
Before committing to a change, look at the conditions around it, write the outcome you want, and narrow the initiative to a scope you can actually shape.
- Map each stakeholder’s perspective before you try to align them
Identify the people an initiative affects, state what each one sees, and check your own assumptions about power before you seek agreement.
- Write the leader you want to be, then review what you learn
Put in a few sentences the kind of leader you want to be, compare that with one recent situation, and write down what the gap teaches you.
- Alternate between immersion and stepping back to reflect
Work through a stretch of real tasks, then stop to write what happened and what you noticed, and repeat the cycle rather than reviewing only at the end.
- Train attention with a daily practice such as meditation
Pick one short daily attention practice, such as meditation, and carry the attention it trains into meetings and one-on-one conversations.
Concepts associés
- Torbert’s Seven Action Logics of Leadership
Seven ways leaders make sense of pressure, how common each is, and how to work with your own
- Le leadership adaptatif, rendu pratique
Distinguer les défis adaptatifs des problèmes techniques — et diriger en conséquence
- Vertical Development Practices: How Adults Grow, Not Just Add Skills
Heat, colliding perspectives, and sense-making — and what the research can and cannot promise
- La théorie sujet-objet de Kegan, en pratique
Passer d'être mené par ses présupposés à pouvoir les examiner