Coaching practices for We're Treating This Like a Fight When Actually We Both Want the Same Outcome the Project to Land Well This to Be Over Before the Deadline and I Keep Forgetting to Just Name That Out Loud as the Common Ground We Could Build on Instead of Clashing
Describe almost anything you are working through and IX Coach finds the practices whose real-world fit is closest. For We're Treating This Like a Fight When Actually We Both Want the Same Outcome the Project to Land Well This to Be Over Before the Deadline and I Keep Forgetting to Just Name That Out Loud as the Common Ground We Could Build on Instead of Clashing, these are the strongest matches in the current practice library.
Does this sound like the set of challenges you might be facing?
- We’re treating this like a fight when actually we both want the same outcome
- Every time we get into this it turns into my side versus theirs, two solutions dug in, and it never occurs to either of us that we might actually want the same thing underneath the fight.
- We both keep digging into our positions and neither of us is really hearing why the other one cares
- We’re about to sit down to hash this out and I can already feel us both arriving armed, each braced to win our version
- We’re both dug into opposing positions and treating it like one of us has to lose, but this is someone I’ll keep working with and the outcome genuinely matters to both of us
Practices that may help
- Identify compatible interests for joint gain
When both sides care about the same thing — quality, reputation, timing — agreements that serve that shared interest outperform splits.
Interests vs. Positions: The Core of Integrative Negotiation - Find mutual purpose
Establish a shared goal both people care about so the conversation is "us vs the problem".
Crucial Conversations, Made Practical - Collaborating (assertive and cooperative)
Work the underlying interests until you find a solution that genuinely meets both sides’ needs.
The Five Conflict-Resolution Styles - Ask "Are you willing to find a solution better than either of us has thought of?"
Open the conversation with a single question that resets both parties from adversaries to co-creators.
The Third Alternative, Made Practical - Use Collaborating when the relationship and the solution both matter
Collaborating — high assertive, high cooperative — finds a solution that genuinely works for both parties, but it takes time.
The Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) - Model synergy: ask "what would a solution have to look like to address both?"
Use the agreed criteria as a design brief and generate solutions that meet all of them.
The Third Alternative, Made Practical - Map what you actually agree on before diving into the disagreement
Start by explicitly building the shared map before marking where it diverges.
Productive Disagreement, Made Practical - Insist on objective criteria
Anchor the deal to independent standards — market rates, precedent, expert opinion — not willpower.
Getting to Yes: Principled Negotiation - Transform the relationship, not just the issue
Use each conflict as an opportunity to raise the quality of the relationship itself.
The Third Alternative, Made Practical - Find the crux: the one claim that, if changed, would change the conclusion
Locate the single empirical or value disagreement driving the whole dispute.
Productive Disagreement, Made Practical
Related concerns
- How To Find Common Ground
Establish a shared goal both people care about so the conversation is "us vs the problem".
Find mutual purpose
- When The Third Alternative Define Success Together
Agree on the criteria a good solution must meet before either side proposes anything.
Define what success looks like together, before proposing solutions
- When Thomas Kilmann Conflict Collaborating When To Use
Work the underlying interests until you find a solution that genuinely meets both sides’ needs.
Collaborating (assertive and cooperative)
- Adversarial Collaboration
Find someone whose genuine prior is the opposite of yours, and work together on the same evidence.
Invite an adversarial collaborator
- Cofounder Conflict
Work the underlying interests until you find a solution that genuinely meets both sides’ needs.
- Collaborative Problem Solving Ross Greene During Conflict
Ross Greene’s Collaborative Problem Solving model holds that kids with explosive behavior lack the cognitive skills to handle frustration and inflexibility — not the motivation. The approach replaces punitive consequences with structured adult–child conversations that build lagging skills over time. Randomized trials in clinical settings show significant reductions in explosive behavior, though most real-world evidence is clinical and observational.
Describe your situation in your own words to search the complete practice library.